Letter to Patients about Texas State Medical Board Disciplinary Action
from Dr. William J. Rea
Website Special September 2007
Environmental Health Center - Dallas
WIlliam J. Rea, M.D.
Board Certified in
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Abdominal and General Surgery
8345 Walnut Hill Lane - Suite 220, Dallas,Texas 75231
Facsimile: (214) 691-8432
September 18, 2007
This letter is being sent to you so that we may provide information about a potential
serious potential threat to your choice of medical care. To put it bluntly,
there is currently an organized nation-wide effort to destroy the specialty
of Environmental Medicine and to eliminate from practice physicians who
diagnose and treat patients suffering from chemical sensitivities.
Since October of 2005 the Texas Medical Board has been investigating me on charges
of providing substandard care and “endangering public health.” An anonymous
third party complaint was made to the board against me, citing five specific
patients as being mistreated. You may ask “What is an anonymous third party
complaint?” This type of complaint is made to the board without the knowledge
or consent of the patient. The complaint against me was almost certainly
made by United Health Care/Oxford. All five patients cited in the complaint
had no knowledge that they or their information was being used in this
way. Further, none of the patients are alleging mistreatment or malpractice
against me and all five are still under my care. Additionally, these patients
have all written to the Texas Medical Board and informed them that they
are not part of this complaint and they are not making any allegations
against me of any kind. Two of the patients have stated that I saved their
The Texas Medical Board has dismissed the protests of these patients and continues
to pursue charges against me. Further, the board refuses to officially
reveal who made the complaint, what I am alleged to have done, or what
evidence was presented against me. They continually maintain that this
information is protected and does not have to be revealed. However, we
are almost certain that United Health Care/Oxford is behind the complaint.
All five patients were from Manhattan (New York City), New York and all
had the same insurance company - United Health Care/Oxford. As you know,
our clinic does not take insurance, so all patients file claims directly
with their respective insurance companies. We therefore do not have any
direct connection with this insurance company. Evidence showing these facts
was supplied to the Texas Medical Board, but was apparently disregarded
as they have decided to pursue the charges despite the evidence.
The board has conducted an anonymous so-called peer review of the five patient’s
medical records and the treatment they received, again without the permission
of these patients. A peer review of a physician’s action can be undertaken for
a variety of reasons but there is always one common factor in the process. That
common factor is that the reviewer is required to be both knowledgeable about
and a practitioner of the specialty that is being reviewed. Thus, the reviewer
is a “peer” of the physician being reviewed.
In my case the Texas Medical Board chose a reviewer who does not specialize in
Environmental Medicine, and who is in fact an allergist. This reviewer, who was
anonymous, gave a negative review of the treatment of the five patients, despite
the fact that all have improved, several of them substantially so, while under
my care. I had 17 actual peers, physicians who practice Environmental Medicine,
review all five of these cases as well. To a person these 17 reviewers found
that my treatment of these patients was not only adequate, but that it met or
exceeded the standard of care for treatment in our specialty. Further, the reviewers
also noted that the state board reviewer was UNINFORMED about the specialty of
Environmental Medicine, clearly did not understand the complex nature of the
diagnosis and treatment of patients who suffer from chemical sensitivities, grossly
misunderstood many of the facts in the medical records, was antagonistic towards
and biased against the specialty of Environmental Medicine, and was clearly unqualified
to conduct such a review due to lack of experience, knowledge, and expressed
biases. The board has chosen to dismiss the review done by 17 actual peers and
has chosen to support the conclusion of their one unqualified reviewer.
Based on secret evidence provided by an anonymous accuser and supported by an
anonymous reviewer, the board has recommended that my license to practice medicine
be placed in jeopardy. Currently, the Texas Medical Board is one of the most
difficult for physicians to deal with in the entire country. It is particularly
noted for not treating physicians fairly and denying their basic constitutional
rights. Pleased be assured that I still have my license, that I am fighting the
charges, that the Environmental Health Center is still open, and we are still
seeing patients and plan to continue doing so.
Unfortunately, my case is not unique. Recently across the United States there
has been an organized attempt to deprive citizens of their choice in individual
health care by attempting to have the licenses of doctors who are deemed to practice “alternative” medicine
revoked. This campaign has been going on for at least 10 years now and is being
led primarily by health insurance companies. These efforts are also being supported
by a small group of individuals (and other groups) working for or associated
with the National Council Against Health Fraud in Allentown, Pennsylvania. The
typical pattern in these attacks is to single out physicians they do not like
and file anonymous complaints against them with different state medical boards.
For example, over the past 10 years the number of physicians who are willing
to diagnose and treat Lyme Disease has dropped sharply, while cases of Lyme disease
have skyrocketed. This is because several health insurance companies have systematically
targeted the doctors who specialized in treating that illness. Many of these
physicians have had complaints made against them in exactly the same manner that
they have been made against me. These same types of complaints have been made
against doctors who treat patients for chemical sensitivities, mold exposure,
for Gulf War Syndrome, and now possibly against physicians who are treating patients
who were injured in the 9/11 tragedy.
You may ask why this campaign is taking place. It appears that quite simply the
health insurance companies want to be the sole arbiter of what types of treatments
are available to patients, and thus what they will be required to pay. They clearly
do not want new diagnoses and treatments established because they will then have
to pay for these. Finally, many of us who have been turned in to state medical
boards do not take insurance assignment. We do this so that we can provide treatment
to our patients without insurance company interference. In recent years the health
insurance carriers have tried to automate their claims processing procedures.
When claims are denied, they then have to be handled by a human and this costs
money. When physicians do not accept insurance assignment, the claims submitted
by their patients often have a higher denial rate. This results in higher processing
costs for the insurance companies. If these carriers can eliminate the independent
physicians with higher denial rates they can potentially save a lot of money.
Certain state medical boards appear to agree with this strategy and cooperate
in the process.
Of course, these attempts are also being made in order to try and standardize
treatments and make all patients fit into one “box.” Americans need more choices
in health care, not fewer. We hope you, as an informed citizen, want to be part
of an effort to help preserve freedom of choice in health care. Insurance carriers
and a small group of “Quack busters” should not be allowed to decide what type
of health care is available in this country.
It is unconscionable that the Texas Medical Board would want to limit freedom
of choice in health care, and allow insurance carriers to interfere with the
doctor-patient relationship. Please join our effort for freedom of choice in
health care and write your protest to members of the Texas Legislature. You can
also copy your protest to members of the Texas Medical Board.
If you do not know who your representatives are, go to the following website
to find out: http://www.fyi.legis.state.tx.us/ If you are out of state, you can
contact Texas State Senator Jane Nelson and Representative Fred Brown, both of
whom have taken an interest in recent activities of the Texas Medical Board.
You can also send letters of protest to the Executive Director of the Texas Medical
Board, Donald Patrick, M.D., J.D., by mail, phone, or fax.
Please petition the elected officials to:
1. Support the dismissal of the anonymous complaint made against Dr. Rea, or
at the very least the revelation of who made the complaint and what evidence
was presented against him.
2. Prohibit the Texas Medical Board from conducting anonymous peer reviews by
unqualified reviewers, or using reviewers with a bias or conflict of interest.
3. Prohibit the Texas Medical Board from accepting and pursuing complaints in
such a way that they deprive physicians of their constitutional rights and their
ability to defend themselves.
4. Strongly oppose the anonymity given to billion
dollar insurance companies when making state board complaints against physicians.
5. Urge the Texas Legislature to hold hearings on the Texas Medical Board and
their seeming cooperation with health insurance companies’ attempts to de-license
physicians in specialties that they do not like and the board’s denial of due
process to accused physicians in direct contradiction to the due process that
the board claims that it provides.
Thank you very much for your help. Together, we can stop the Texas Medical Board
and other state medical boards from unfairly targeting physicians that outside
interests do not like. We can also expose the despicable tactics of the insurance
companies in their efforts to control all aspects of healthcare.
William J. Rea,
Environmental Health Center-Dallas
Texas Senator Jane Nelson
Chair of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee
P. O. Box 12068
Austin, TX 78711
Representative Fred Brown
Room CAP GWA
P.O. Box 2910
Austin, Texas 78768
Members of the Texas Medical Board:
Correspondence to the Board Members can be sent to:
Texas Medical Board
P. O. Box 2018
Austin, Texas 78768
TEL: (512) 305-7030
FAX: (512) 305-7051
Donald W. Patrick, M.D., J.D. (Executive Director)
Lawrence LaZelle Anderson, M.D. (Dermatology)
Michael Arambula, M.D. (Psychiatry)
Julie Attebury (Public Member)
Jose M. Benavides, M.D. (Internal Medicine)
Patricia S. Blackwell (Public Member)
Melina S. Fredricks (Public Member)
Manual G. Guajardo, M.D. (Obstetrics/Gynecology)
Roberta M. Kalafut, D.O. (Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation)
Amanullah Khan, M.D. (Oncology)
Melina McMichael, M.D. (Internal Medicine)
Margaret C. McNeese, M.D. (Pediatrics)
Charles E. Oswalt, III,M.D. (Trauma Surgeon)
Larry Price, D.O. (Cardiovascular Diseases)
Current Board Vice President
Annette P. Raggette (Public Member)
Paulette B. Southard (Public Member)
Timothy J. Turner (Public Member)
Timothy Webb (Public Member)
Irvin E. Zeitler, Jr., D.O. (Family Practice)